We wish, to put it simple, to fulfil the Fall, to see where that mythic
beginning can take us. We want to push the boundaries of flesh and
transcend our humanity, riding on the wings of demons and exploring the
qliphothic tunnels that lead us to the Beyond. - Fall of Man
The age of consumerism and blind worship of quantity has left very few places uninfected by its depravity. Unfortunately cankerous influence of the age also extends to the occult book markets, which are, more and more, flood with subpar thinking and writing. Fortunately for the critical conneisseur, there still are publishers like the Fall of Man, who stand proudly for the quality. Without further ado, here's Alex.
What
is your personal history with the printed word? Do you have a formal
education that is in some way linked to the literature and/or
publishing?
Reading
has always been my passion for as long as I can remember, and I can
not think of another thing that has been always present in my life as
my love for the written word has. Even so, my formal education is not
related to literature or Philology (it could not be further away,
actually). I do have, on the other hand, several years of experience
as a professional editor and translator, which did qualify me for the
task at hand.
When
you were starting out with Fall of Man, was it clear to you, from the
very beginning, that you are going to specialize in occult
literature?
I
had been personally invested with the occult for many years before I
decided to start Fall of Man, so when the opportunity to have my own
publishing house presented itself, it was clear that it would be
exclusively occult literature. At the moment there were not that many
publishers, and I knew that I had the knowledge and the will to start
something that could be great.
How
do you view the current situation in the occult book markets? Are
there some specific publishers, whose work you especially hold in
esteem?
I
think that we are right now living in a renaissance of sorts when it
comes to the occult scene. Never before have there been so many
publishers, authors and public in general interested in the subject.
I think though there is still room for growth, and for old ideas to
be given a new twist in a positive way. On the other hand, what may
be saturating the market are the number of journals and magazines; I
am not saying there is no interest in them, because there obviously
is, but I think it is more of a trend and that it will eventually
wear off. This is in no way a critique to the format; I absolutely
love the freedom of layout, contents and presentation that a magazine
gives, compared to a traditional book release.
There
are lots of excellent publishers right now, something that can only
benefit the scene, but if I had to chose I would have to at least
mention Ixaxaar, for their pioneering work in the field and excellent
releases, and Scarlet Imprint, for their beautifully crafted
editions.
For
an oldschooler like me, who always needs the real, tangible book, the
phenomenon of eBook is an abomination, but how about you? Do you find
something positive about this new invention?
We
can not deny the practicality of the electronic format, but I
personally will always prefer the feel of having a physical copy in
my hands. But as technology progresses we can not turn our backs to
this new media which is obviously here to stay, especially as
publishers. From the author's and publisher's point of view there are
indeed negative sides to e-book, but as a reader it is great to be
able to have thousands of titles instantly available. We have started
experimenting with electronic formats through our new series Nox Sine
Occasu, and so far the response has been widely positive, especially
for the fact that we do not use any particular security measures,
forcing people to use this or that format. As they say, information
wants to be free, and we think that if someone is interested in
pirating our releases they are going to find a way to do so... And
each copy out there, legally acquired or not, spreads our work
further.
Next,
a few questions about your favorites. Let’s begin with the occult
books. Could you name your favorite three occult books? Could you
also open up a little bit, what made you choose exactly these three
works?
First
of all, I need to point out that I am not the only person behind Fall
of Man, and I am sure my collaborators would have a different saying,
but this is my list:
- “Kybalion”. As a kid, I spent hours in my parent's library, always searching for something new to read. One day I found this little volume, and thus my passion for the occult begun.
- “Initiation into Hermetics”, by Franz Bardon. This volume was the one I started to experiment most seriously with, and made me realize the power behind seriously performed magic. It really opened my eyes to a lot of other stuff I had disdained as nonsense. All the collection of techniques Mr. Bardon presented on that book really made sense to me, and I still find them useful to this day.
- “Works of Darkness” by E.A. Koetting. This book made me realize how big, pompous rituals are actually not necessary in order to obtain the desired effects, how one can simplify it to the basics and still have powerful results. Before it, I really tried to replicate exactly the conditions described in the ritual, and that is something that can be complicated sometimes, as anybody working with Lemegeton for example knows very well.
And
then your favorite three non-occult books?
- “Foucault's pendulum”, by Umberto Eco. In fact, I could have chosen any other by Umberto Eco, as his books are always really entertaining and inspiring.
- “Gateway” by Frederik Pohl. I am a big science fiction fan, and this book (and its follow-ups) is among the best ones I've read. The author passed away recently, by the way, a great loss.
- “The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath” by H.P. Lovecraft. As probably every single student of the occult, the influence of Lovecraft's work was key to my discovery of the occult arts. As a kid, reading about the oniric adventures of Randolph Carter, it made me begin to understand that there are worlds beyond ours that could be reached if one wanted so.
The
introductory text on your website states that the Fall of Man, as a
publisher, is not limited to one specific tradition, but do you,
personally, feel a strong affinity with some particular tradition?
I
think my capacity to remained attentive to the same subject is too
short for me to be able to stick to the same tradition for longer
than a year, so even if I did belong to different groups in the past,
and have a personal connection to the Sufi traditions for example, I
don't have any particular affinity nowadays. I am a lone
practitioner, and therefore quite eclectic, as I suspect is the case
with the majority of practitioners nowadays. I do orbit towards Left
Hand Path teachings though, something I think is obvious based on
Fall of Man's releases.
The
same text also mentions the ‘qliphothic tunnels’. There seems to
be some kind of revival or resurgence going on with this subject;
Starfire Publishing is re-releasing the classic works of late Kenneth
Grant, Ixaxaar has released couple of volumes that are related to the
qliphothic side of things, and the subject has also become quite
popular within the black metal subculture. What is your personal take
on the subject? Do you have some kind of theory, why qliphoth has
become so popular among the milieus of Western occultism?
Since
most of westerners practice western magic, or at least westernized
versions of it, I think it is natural for anybody wanting to study
the dark side of things to stumble upon the Qliphoth. Kabbalah is,
after all, one of the pillars of Western occultism, and something
easily accessible to anybody interested in the subject. Therefore, if
a person interested in black magic learns about the existence of the
Qliphoth, I think it is natural that they be drawn to it. Even more,
working with qliphothic tunnels is a very effective thing, and many
modern organizations base their teachings around them, so I think it
is normal that it is so widely spread.
Some
proponents of the Order of Nine Angles (ONA) have leveled serious
criticism towards working with the qliphothic spheres, seeing these
as nothing but a one form of ‘Magian Distortion of the West’.
Having released an ONA-related book, Threshold by Ryan
Anschauung, I’m sure you are familiar with ONA’s criticism. So,
how do you view the arguments of ONA?
As
a matter of fact, I did not know ONA's official standing on the
subject. Despite the fact that we released Threshold, I was never
really into ONA's teaching; I simply read several of Ryan's articles
and found them very interesting, so we decided to contact him for a
possible release. He certainly has his own opinions and ways of doing
things, and I suspect that is the reason the Temple of THEM is no
longer affiliated to ONA, since I can't imagine Ryan following
anybody's path but his own. As for ONA's view on the qliphothic
tunnels; they are of course entitled to say and think whatever they
want, but I think that the qliphoth have been so extensively used by
so many practitioners that the fact that they do help towards one's
personal spiritual progress has been proven. But as it is the case
with so many other things, they are just “tools”, and each one of
us is different; what may be useful for one person can be total
rubbish for another. The good thing nowadays is that there are so
many alternatives out there, that fortunately we do not need to stick
to one thing, and we can try and try until we find what works for us.
Now
that we are at it, what is your opinion on the current status of the
ONA? The Temple of THEM seems to have evolved into a formidable
force, but otherwise the ONA seems to be only a pale shadow of its
former glory.
As
I mentioned before, I have never been too involved with the ONA and
their teachings, therefore I do not have anything meaningful to say
about their present state. On the other hand, I think I know better
the situation with the Temple of THEM... The fact is that the people
behind THEM are very serious about their work, and since it is a
small group, they have better control over their output. They are
very active, and have a big community of online followers who respect
them. Ryan is the most visible face, and he is an unstoppable force
when it comes to spreading his ideas and discoveries, so it is no
wonder why they are in the rise. I think that the fact that they have
disassociated themselves from the ONA has also helped them grow in a
different direction, one that may be resonating better with the
present state of the occult scene.
Somewhat
related to the previous question, for many people the standard
explanation for any and all shortcomings and weaknesses of modern-day
occultism, is the phenomenon of Internet. In the past, so the
argument goes, people were walking the walk, whereas nowadays they
are just talking the talk, and the Internet is the one to blame. The
Internet has been, of course, a mixed blessing, but can it be
justifiably blamed for the fact that more and more people are taking
the easy way out?
As
you say, the Internet has been a mixed blessing, not only with the
occult, but with every other aspect of the modern world. The instant
availability of information has made hunting after rare books much
easier... I remember before the Internet, every time I got my hands
on an occult book I felt I found a real treasure, since they were so
hard to come by. I use to spend hours searching on second hand
stores... Nowadays we have things like the Hermetic Library, which is
an amazing tool. This instant availability of material has the
downside of trivializing it; we have so many options so rapidly
available that we do not take the necessary time to analyze and study
each one of them properly. I see this same thing happening to me, so
I imagine that the younger generations, those who grew up with the
Internet always being there, must take it all for granted and not
search properly for what they are looking for. In a world of instant
gratification, something as delicate and slow-going as studying magic
must feel very tedious, and that is probably why people take the easy
way out, as you say.
Musick
is an important part of the Sinister Angles blog, and therefore all
the interviewees will get at least one music-related question. So,
could you tell what kind of musick you like? Could you also name some
of your all-time favorite bands, artists and composers?
I
always gravitated towards the dark side of things, so I tend to
listen to dark music: Post-Punk, Gothic Rock, Black Metal, EBM...
Music is a very important part of my life and it has definitely
shaped me into who I am today. As for my all-time favorite bands, I
would have to say:
- Paradise Lost. This band has always been a constant in my life, no matter what; their “Draconian times” album opened my eyes to a whole new side of music, and despite the fact that I have been listening to it since its release, I still love it and play it almost every week. Simply perfect. I lost track of them when they started doing weird things after their “Host” album, but the last two albums are really good, it seems they found themselves again.
- Sisters of Mercy. Another band that has always been a constant in my life. Not much to say, apart from how great they are.
- Covenant (the electronic, Swedish band, not the Black Metal band). I never really cared for electronic music, until I listened to this band back in 98. Some of the coldest, darkest songs ever created, truly amazing sonic landscapes.
- Satyricon. With each album they release, they basically create a new Black Metal sub-genre. I can listen to their first four albums on a loop without getting tired, simply perfect.
Thus
far Fall of Man has released only non-fiction, but could you
consider, in the future, to release also fiction that is in alignment
with your aims?
Now
and then we receive a few fiction manuscripts, but we always turn
them down because we want to focus exclusively on non-fiction,
serious occult books. I can not say this will never change, but for
the foreseeable future it will remain that way.
If
any reader of this interview is about to contact you in view of
possible publication, what kind of things he or she should take into
account? For example, should he or she have almost finished
manuscript when making an initial contact, or is it fine to contact
you already at an earlier stage?
People
usually come to us with a finished or almost finished manuscript, but
if someone were to present us with a serious investigation proposal
on a interesting subject, we would also be interested. Even so, we
never send out the contract until we read the final version of the
manuscript, to make sure there are no nasty surprises. Our next
release, "The
Ophidic Essence: Seeking a return to the Origin"
has been on the making for over a year now; the author contacted us
with a very good draft, we asked him to develope it and to come back
to us when it was done, and that we would give him our input if so
desired, during the whole process. We think that it has been a very
satisfactory collaboration, and that is the most optimal way to do
things. We understand and respect the fact that some authors are very
protective of their work, and may not want any external influence,
but for those who need a push in what we consider the right
direction, we are more than willing to help and counsel.
Thank
you, Alex, for this interview. The last words are, of course, yours.
Thank
you very much for taking time preparing this interview, your support
is greatly appreciated! Kiitos!
No comments:
Post a Comment